CodeReview Compass: Peer Review Documentation Templates for Development Teams
Updated: February 22, 2026
Complete template system for conducting thorough, consistent code reviews that improve code quality while building stronger development teams.
What's Inside
- Standardized review checklists for different code types
- Constructive feedback templates that improve team communication
- Progress tracking sheets for review quality metrics
Preview
CodeReview Compass: Peer Review Documentation Templates for Development Teams
Overview
Transform your development team's code review process with this comprehensive collection of templates designed to standardize, streamline, and enhance peer review practices. Whether you're establishing a new review process or optimizing an existing one, these templates provide the structure and consistency needed for effective code reviews that improve code quality, knowledge sharing, and team collaboration.
What's Included
This template pack contains 8 comprehensive templates covering every aspect of the code review process, from initial planning to post-review follow-up. Each template includes clear instructions, customizable sections, and best practice guidance to help your team maintain high standards while fostering a constructive review culture.
Template 1: Pre-Review Planning Template
Code Review Preparation Checklist
Instructions: Complete this template before submitting code for review to ensure your changes are review-ready and provide reviewers with necessary context.
Project: [PROJECT_NAME]
Feature/Issue: [FEATURE_DESCRIPTION_OR_ISSUE_NUMBER]
Author: [DEVELOPER_NAME]
Date: [SUBMISSION_DATE]
Estimated Review Time: [TIME_ESTIMATE]
Change Summary
Brief Description: [ONE_SENTENCE_SUMMARY_OF_CHANGES]
Detailed Description:
[PROVIDE_DETAILED_EXPLANATION_OF_WHAT_WAS_CHANGED_AND_WHY]
Pre-Review Self-Assessment
- [ ] Code compiles without errors
- [ ] All tests pass locally
- [ ] Code follows team style guidelines
- [ ] Documentation updated (if applicable)
- [ ] Breaking changes documented
- [ ] Security considerations addressed
Files Changed
| File Path | Type of Change | Lines Added/Removed | Notes |
|-----------|----------------|-------------------|--------|
| [FILE_PATH_1] | [NEW/MODIFIED/DELETED] | [+X/-Y] | [BRIEF_NOTE] |
| [FILE_PATH_2] | [NEW/MODIFIED/DELETED] | [+X/-Y] | [BRIEF_NOTE] |
Testing Information
Test Coverage: [PERCENTAGE_OR_DESCRIPTION]
Test Types Included: [UNIT/INTEGRATION/E2E]
Manual Testing Performed: [DESCRIBE_MANUAL_TESTING_STEPS]
Dependencies and Requirements
New Dependencies: [LIST_ANY_NEW_LIBRARIES_OR_PACKAGES]
Environment Requirements: [SPECIAL_SETUP_OR_CONFIGURATION_NEEDED]
Database Changes: [MIGRATIONS_OR_SCHEMA_CHANGES]
Reviewer Guidance
Specific Areas for Focus: [HIGHLIGHT_AREAS_NEEDING_SPECIAL_ATTENTION]
Known Issues/Limitations: [ACKNOWLEDGE_ANY_TEMPORARY_SOLUTIONS_OR_LIMITATIONS]
Review Priority: [HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW]
Template 2: Code Review Checklist Template
Comprehensive Code Review Checklist
Instructions: Use this checklist during the review process to ensure consistent and thorough evaluation. Customize the criteria based on your team's standards and technology stack.
Pull Request: [PR_NUMBER_OR_LINK]
Reviewer: [REVIEWER_NAME]
Review Date: [REVIEW_DATE]
Time Spent: [REVIEW_DURATION]
Code Quality Assessment
#### Functionality
- [ ] Code accomplishes the intended purpose
- [ ] Edge cases are handled appropriately
- [ ] Error handling is implemented correctly
- [ ] Business logic is sound and complete
- [ ] Notes: [SPECIFIC_OBSERVATIONS_OR_CONCERNS]
#### Code Structure and Design
- [ ] Code follows SOLID principles
- [ ] Functions/methods have single responsibilities
- [ ] Code is DRY (Don't Repeat Yourself)
- [ ] Appropriate design patterns used
- [ ] Notes: [DESIGN_FEEDBACK]
#### Readability and Maintainability
- [ ] Code is self-documenting with clear variable/function names
- [ ] Complex logic includes helpful comments
- [ ] Code follows team style guidelines
- [ ] Consistent formatting and indentation
- [ ] Notes: [READABILITY_COMMENTS]
#### Performance and Security
- [ ] No obvious performance bottlenecks
- [ ] Database queries are optimized
- [ ] Security best practices followed
- [ ] Input validation implemented
- [ ] Notes: [PERFORMANCE_SECURITY_NOTES]
Testing and Documentation
#### Test Coverage
- [ ] Adequate unit test coverage
- [ ] Integration tests included (if applicable)
- [ ] Tests cover edge cases and error conditions
- [ ] Test names are descriptive
- [ ] Coverage Percentage: [TEST_COVERAGE_PERCENTAGE]
#### Documentation
- [ ] Code comments are helpful and accurate
- [ ] API documentation updated
- [ ] README or us...