CodeReview Catalyst: Peer Feedback Templates for Junior Developers
Updated: February 22, 2026
Comprehensive template collection that transforms junior developers into confident code reviewers through structured feedback frameworks and peer collaboration tools.
What's Inside
- 50+ structured code review templates covering different programming languages and scenarios
- Communication frameworks for giving diplomatic yet actionable feedback to peers
- Self-assessment checklists to evaluate your own code before submitting for review
Preview
CodeReview Catalyst: Peer Feedback Templates for Junior Developers
A comprehensive template pack designed to help junior developers, coding bootcamp graduates, and early-career programmers navigate the code review process with confidence and professionalism.
Introduction
Code reviews are one of the most valuable learning opportunities for junior developers, but they can also be intimidating. This template pack provides you with structured, professional templates to help you participate effectively in code reviews, whether you're reviewing your own code, requesting feedback from peers, or responding to reviews from others.
Each template includes clear instructions and customizable placeholders to help you communicate effectively and build strong collaborative relationships with your development team.
Self-Review Templates
Template 1: Pre-Submission Self-Review Checklist
When to use: Before submitting your code for peer review to ensure quality and completeness.
Instructions: Fill in each section honestly and thoroughly. Use this as a final check before requesting reviews from teammates.
```markdown
Self-Review: [FEATURE/BUG FIX NAME]
Code Changes Summary
What I implemented: [Briefly describe what you built or fixed]
Files modified: [List the main files you changed]
Estimated time spent: [Hours/days spent on this work]
Self-Assessment Checklist
- [ ] Code follows team style guidelines
- [ ] All functions/methods have appropriate comments
- [ ] Edge cases are handled appropriately
- [ ] No obvious performance issues
- [ ] Tests are written and passing
- [ ] No debugging code or console.logs left behind
- [ ] Variable and function names are descriptive
Areas I'm Confident About
[List 2-3 aspects of your implementation that you feel good about]
Areas I'd Like Feedback On
[List specific areas where you want reviewer attention - be specific!]
Questions for Reviewers
- [Specific technical question about your approach]
- [Question about best practices or alternative solutions]
- [Any other concerns or areas for improvement]
Testing Done
[Describe how you tested your changes - manual testing, automated tests, etc.]
```
Template 2: Post-Review Self-Reflection
When to use: After receiving and addressing code review feedback to track your learning progress.
Instructions: Complete this template after each code review cycle to identify patterns and growth opportunities.
```markdown
Self-Reflection: Code Review for [FEATURE/BUG FIX NAME]
Review Summary
Reviewer(s): [Names of people who reviewed your code]
Review date: [Date]
Number of comments received: [Count of feedback items]
Key Feedback Themes
Most common feedback type: [e.g., code style, logic issues, performance, etc.]
Feedback I expected: [Issues you knew about before submission]
Feedback that surprised me: [Issues you didn't anticipate]
What I Learned
New concepts/patterns: [Technical knowledge gained from this review]
Best practices: [Coding standards or practices you learned]
Tools/techniques: [New tools, shortcuts, or methods discovered]
Action Items for Future Code
- [Specific behavior or practice to implement going forward]
- [Another improvement to focus on in next submissions]
- [Knowledge gap to research and fill]
Questions to Research
[List any topics mentioned in the review that you want to learn more about]
Reviewer Appreciation
[Note something specific you appreciated about each reviewer's feedback style or insights]
```
Peer Review Request Templates
Template 3: Formal Review Request
When to use: When requesting a thorough code review from teammates, especially for significant features or complex changes.
Instructions: Customize this template based on the size and complexity of your changes. Be specific about what kind of feedback you need.
```markdown
Code Review Request: [FEATURE/BUG FIX NAME]
Hi [REVIEWER NAME(S)],
I'd appreciate your review of my implementation for [BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF WORK].
Context
Ticket/Issue: [Link to ticket or issue number]
Branch: [Branch name for review]
Estimated review time: [Your estimate: 15 mins, 30 mins, 1 hour, etc.]
What This PR Does
[2-3 sentence summary of the changes and their purpose]
Key Changes
- [Bullet point of major change 1]
- [Bullet point of major change 2]
- [Bullet point of major change 3]
Specific Review Focus Areas
Please pay special attention to:
- [Specific area - e.g., "error handling in the API integration"]
- [Specific area - e.g., "performance of the data processing loop"]
- [Specific area - e.g., "accessibility of the new fo...